Term Breech Trial
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group
On this page
Overview
For selected term breech pregnancies, planned caesarean section reduced perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity versus planned vaginal birth.
Clinical takeaway
In selected singleton frank or complete breech pregnancies at term, a policy of planned caesarean section reduced perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity compared with planned vaginal birth. Serious maternal complications did not differ.
Key result
Perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity: 17 of 1039 (1.6%) with planned caesarean vs 52 of 1039 (5.0%) with planned vaginal birth (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.56; P<0.0001).
Practice impact
For selected term breech, plan caesarean section when discussing delivery; this is a policy comparison, not actual caesarean versus actual vaginal birth.
Evidence
Study design
Randomised multicentre trial comparing a policy of planned caesarean section with a policy of planned vaginal birth, analyzed by intention to treat.
Enrollment
2,088
Follow-up
Mothers and infants were followed up to 6 weeks post partum.
Geography
26 countries
Clinical question
Does a policy of planned caesarean section reduce perinatal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, without increasing serious maternal complications, compared with planned vaginal birth for selected term breech pregnancies?
Population
- 2088 women with a singleton fetus in a frank or complete breech presentation at term, enrolled at 121 centres in 26 countries.
- Women having a vaginal breech delivery had an experienced clinician at the birth.
Intervention
Policy of planned caesarean section.
Comparator
Policy of planned vaginal birth.
Primary outcome
Perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity; and maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity.
On intention-to-treat analysis, the neonatal composite occurred in 17 of 1039 (1.6%) with planned caesarean section vs 52 of 1039 (5.0%) with planned vaginal birth. Maternal mortality or serious morbidity did not differ (3.9% vs 3.2%; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79-1.95; P=0.35).
Relative risk / 0.33 / 95% CI 0.19-0.56 / p<0.0001
Key results
- Data were received for 2083 of 2088 randomized women. Of 1041 assigned planned caesarean section, 941 (90.4%) delivered by caesarean section. Of 1042 assigned planned vaginal birth, 591 (56.7%) delivered vaginally.
- On intention-to-treat analysis, perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity occurred in 17 of 1039 (1.6%) with planned caesarean section vs 52 of 1039 (5.0%) with planned vaginal birth (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.56; P<0.0001).
- Maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity did not differ (41 of 1041 [3.9%] vs 33 of 1042 [3.2%]; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79-1.95; P=0.35).
Harms
- Maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity did not differ (41 of 1041 [3.9%] vs 33 of 1042 [3.2%]; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79-1.95; P=0.35).
Clinical Use
Practice impact
- For selected singleton frank or complete breech at term, counsel that planned caesarean section lowered short-term perinatal death or serious neonatal morbidity, with similar serious maternal complications through 6 weeks.
Applicability
- Most applicable to women with a singleton frank or complete breech at term, delivered at centres that could provide an experienced clinician for vaginal breech birth, with follow-up to 6 weeks post partum.
Limitations
- 2088 women were randomized and data were received for 2083; the neonatal composite used 1039 infants in each group.
- This is a comparison of delivery policies. Only 56.7% assigned planned vaginal birth delivered vaginally, and 90.4% assigned planned caesarean delivered by caesarean.
- Follow-up in this report is to 6 weeks post partum.
Common misinterpretations
- This is planned caesarean versus planned vaginal birth, not a comparison of women who actually had caesarean versus vaginal delivery.
- Maternal outcomes were similar; do not cite the trial as showing more serious maternal harm with planned caesarean.
- The trial enrolled selected frank or complete breech presentations with an experienced clinician available for vaginal birth; it does not describe all breech pregnancies.
Related evidence
Citation
Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375-1383. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3
Planned caesarean section is better than planned vaginal birth for the term fetus in the breech presentation; serious maternal complications are similar between the groups.
- PMID
- 11052579