Skip to content
evident

COACT

Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation

Overview

After OHCA without STEMI, immediate coronary angiography did not improve 90-day survival compared with delayed angiography after neurologic recovery.

Clinical takeaway

COACT supports delaying coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without STEMI until after neurologic recovery, rather than going immediately to the lab.

Key result

Ninety-day survival was 64.5% with immediate angiography vs 67.2% with delayed angiography (OR 0.89; p=0.51).

Practice impact

After ROSC without ST elevation, do not send every patient for immediate angiography.

Evidence

Study design

Multicenter randomized trial of immediate versus delayed coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation.

Enrollment

552

Follow-up

Survival at 90 days.

Geography

Not listed

Clinical question

Does immediate coronary angiography improve 90-day survival compared with delayed angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation?

Population

  • Patients successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest without signs of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Intervention

Immediate coronary angiography, with PCI if indicated.

Comparator

Coronary angiography delayed until after neurologic recovery, with PCI if indicated.

Primary outcome

Survival at 90 days.

Immediate angiography was not better than delayed angiography for 90-day survival after cardiac arrest without STEMI.

Odds ratio / 0.89 / 95% CI 0.62-1.27 / p=0.51

Key results

  • Ninety-day survival: 176 of 273 (64.5%) with immediate angiography vs 178 of 265 (67.2%) with delayed angiography; OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.62-1.27; p=0.51).
  • Median time to target temperature was 5.4 hours with immediate angiography vs 4.7 hours with delayed angiography (ratio of geometric means 1.19; 95% CI 1.04-1.36).
  • No significant differences were found in the remaining secondary end points.

Harms

  • Immediate angiography delayed time to target temperature compared with delayed angiography.
  • No significant differences were found in major bleeding, acute kidney injury, or the remaining secondary end points.

Clinical Use

Practice impact

  • After successful resuscitation without ST-segment elevation, delay coronary angiography until after neurologic recovery rather than going immediately to the lab.

Applicability

  • Most applicable to patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who do not have signs of STEMI.

Limitations

  • Results do not apply to patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
  • Immediate angiography delayed time to target temperature.
  • The primary end point was 90-day survival; most secondary end points also did not differ.

Common misinterpretations

  • Immediate angiography is still indicated when STEMI is present; COACT excluded those patients.
  • A strategy that was not better than delayed angiography does not mean angiography is never useful; delayed angiography with PCI if indicated was the comparator.

Citation

Lemkes JS, Janssens GN, van der Hoeven NW, et al. Coronary Angiography after Cardiac Arrest without ST-Segment Elevation. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(15):1397-1407. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1816897

Among patients who had been successfully resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and had no signs of STEMI, a strategy of immediate angiography was not found to be better than a strategy of delayed angiography with respect to overall survival at 90 days.