Skip to content
evident

APPAC

Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview

In CT-proven uncomplicated appendicitis, antibiotics did not meet noninferiority versus appendectomy; most antibiotic-assigned patients avoided surgery at 1 year.

Clinical takeaway

APPAC tested whether antibiotics were noninferior to appendectomy and did not demonstrate noninferiority. Most patients assigned to antibiotics still avoided appendectomy at 1 year, and delayed operations did not produce reported major complications.

Key result

The intention-to-treat difference in treatment efficacy was -27.0% (95% CI -31.6% to infinity; P=0.89) against a 24% noninferiority margin, so noninferiority was not demonstrated. In the antibiotic group, 70 patients (27.3%) had appendectomy within 1 year.

Practice impact

Do not call antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy on APPAC. Noninferiority was not shown; many antibiotic-assigned patients still avoided surgery at 1 year.

Evidence

Study design

Multicenter, open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted in Finland.

Enrollment

530

Follow-up

1 year.

Geography

Finland

Clinical question

Is antibiotic therapy noninferior to appendectomy for CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis?

Population

  • Adults 18 to 60 years old with uncomplicated acute appendicitis confirmed by CT.

Intervention

Intravenous ertapenem 1 g daily for 3 days, followed by 7 days of oral levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and metronidazole 500 mg three times daily.

Comparator

Standard open appendectomy.

Primary outcome

For surgery, successful completion of an appendectomy. For antibiotics, discharge from the hospital without surgery and no recurrent appendicitis during 1-year follow-up.

Antibiotic treatment did not meet the prespecified noninferiority criterion compared with appendectomy (margin 24%).

Risk difference (intention-to-treat) / -27 / 95% CI -31.6% to infinity / p=0.89

Key results

  • Among 530 enrolled patients, 273 were assigned to surgery and 257 to antibiotics. Successful appendectomy occurred in all but 1 surgical patient (99.6%; 95% CI 98.0%-100.0%).
  • In the antibiotic group, 70 patients (27.3%; 95% CI 22.0%-33.2%) underwent appendectomy within 1 year. Of 256 antibiotic-group patients available for follow-up, 186 (72.7%; 95% CI 66.8%-78.0%) did not require surgery.
  • The intention-to-treat difference in treatment efficacy was -27.0% (95% CI -31.6% to infinity; P=0.89). Against a prespecified 24% noninferiority margin, noninferiority of antibiotics relative to surgery was not demonstrated.
  • Of the 70 antibiotic-assigned patients who later had appendectomy, 58 (82.9%) had uncomplicated appendicitis, 7 (10.0%) had complicated acute appendicitis, and 5 (7.1%) did not have appendicitis.

Harms

  • There were no intra-abdominal abscesses or other major complications associated with delayed appendectomy in patients randomized to antibiotic treatment.

Clinical Use

Practice impact

  • Do not tell patients that APPAC proved antibiotics are as good as appendectomy. Noninferiority was not demonstrated.
  • It is fair to say that most patients assigned to antibiotics did not need appendectomy during 1 year, and delayed operations in this trial were not associated with intra-abdominal abscess or other major complications.

Applicability

  • Most applicable to adults 18 to 60 years old in Finland with CT-proven uncomplicated appendicitis, treated with this ertapenem-then-levofloxacin-metronidazole regimen or with open appendectomy.

Limitations

  • The trial was open-label.
  • The surgical comparator was standard open appendectomy, not laparoscopic surgery.
  • One-year follow-up was available for 256 of 257 patients in the antibiotic group.
  • The primary end point was defined differently in each arm, and the noninferiority comparison did not meet the 24% margin.

Common misinterpretations

  • Avoiding surgery in most antibiotic-assigned patients is not the same as meeting noninferiority versus appendectomy.
  • APPAC does not establish antibiotics as equivalent to surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis.

Related evidence

Citation

Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, et al. Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;313(23):2340-2348. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6154

Among patients with CT-proven, uncomplicated appendicitis, antibiotic treatment did not meet the prespecified criterion for noninferiority compared with appendectomy.