Skip to content
evident

ADRENAL

Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock

Overview

In ventilated septic shock, hydrocortisone 200 mg daily for 7 days did not lower 90-day mortality versus placebo.

Clinical takeaway

ADRENAL showed that a continuous hydrocortisone infusion does not improve 90-day survival in ventilated septic shock, even though shock resolved faster and the first ventilation episode was shorter.

Key result

90-day mortality was 27.9% with hydrocortisone vs 28.8% with placebo (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.82-1.10; p=0.50).

Practice impact

Hydrocortisone can be used to shorten shock duration, not as a proven mortality intervention in ventilated septic shock.

Evidence

Study design

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of hydrocortisone versus placebo.

Enrollment

3,800

Follow-up

Death from any cause at 90 days.

Geography

Not listed

Clinical question

Does adjunctive hydrocortisone reduce 90-day mortality in ventilated patients with septic shock?

Population

  • Patients with septic shock who were undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Intervention

Hydrocortisone 200 mg per day as a continuous infusion for 7 days or until death or ICU discharge, whichever came first.

Comparator

Placebo.

Primary outcome

Death from any cause at 90 days.

A continuous hydrocortisone infusion did not lower 90-day mortality compared with placebo in ventilated septic shock.

Odds ratio / 0.95 / 95% CI 0.82-1.10 / p=0.50

Key results

  • 90-day mortality: 27.9% with hydrocortisone vs 28.8% with placebo; odds ratio 0.95 (95% CI 0.82-1.10; p=0.50).
  • Shock resolved faster with hydrocortisone (median 3 vs 4 days; HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.23-1.41; p<0.001).
  • The initial mechanical-ventilation episode was shorter with hydrocortisone (median 6 vs 7 days), but days alive and free from ventilation did not differ once recurrences were counted.
  • Fewer hydrocortisone-treated patients received a blood transfusion (37.0% vs 41.7%).

Harms

  • New-onset bacteremia or fungemia did not differ between hydrocortisone and placebo.

Clinical Use

Practice impact

  • Hydrocortisone can be used to shorten shock duration, not as a proven mortality intervention in ventilated septic shock.

Applicability

  • Most applicable to patients with septic shock who are already on mechanical ventilation and being considered for a hydrocortisone infusion.

Limitations

  • Tested a continuous hydrocortisone infusion without fludrocortisone.
  • Primary outcome status was ascertained in 3658 of 3800 randomized patients.
  • A faster shock-resolution signal did not translate into lower 90-day mortality, 28-day mortality, or more days alive out of the ICU or hospital.

Common misinterpretations

  • A negative mortality result does not mean hydrocortisone has no hemodynamic effect; shock resolved faster.
  • This trial does not answer whether hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone changes survival.

Citation

Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, et al. Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):797-808. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1705835

Among patients with septic shock undergoing mechanical ventilation, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone did not result in lower 90-day mortality than placebo.